Cable Security seals

[Pyra Gorgon]

I found a good source for cable security seals. Actually, a new-found chastity friend clued me in on this source.

here is the link:

http://www.novavisioninc.com/pages/prd_cable_seals.html

These are handy to have. If you have a belt with posts with cross holes, one of these will double as a permanent lock on the belt. Each is serial numbered and the only way to remove one is to destroy it. If you do that, your Keyholder KNOWS you came out of belt unauthorized.

[MaitreZ]

I found a good source for cable security seals. Actually, a new-found chastity friend clued me in on this source.

here is the link:

http://www.novavisioninc.com/pages/prd_cable_seals.html

These are handy to have. If you have a belt with posts with cross holes, one of these will double as a permanent lock on the belt. Each is serial numbered and the only way to remove one is to destroy it. If you do that, your Keyholder KNOWS you came out of belt unauthorized.

Hi Pyra,

I think you should add to your (not very useful nor safe) shield lock one these seals.

[Pyra Gorgon]

@ MaitreZ:

That's the plan. I asked my Keyholder if he wanted me to buy a baggie of 10. Problem is I need two cross drilled posts that can be screwed to the waistband in order to use a security seal. (I asked him if he could fabricate some, he said he would, will take time)

Fear not, will definitely keep you in the know on these.

Just the idea of something inescapable without resorting to destruction makes me all ....anyways. Don't you worry about that!!!

[Larrup]

Seals make a lock not really necessary.

[Pyra Gorgon]

Seals make a lock not really necessary.

It depends.

With just seals, they must be destroyed each time belt is removed.

With a lock, it is reusable. Problem with locks is wearer getting unauthorized access to key, or picking the lock and reinstalling lock before Keyholder discovers that.

If someone is going to be locked long term, or if the Keyholder is remote, then both systems (lock and security seal) offer more options. If wearer is caught being naughty and performing unathorized belt removals, then throwing a security seal on the belt is the fast answer to that behavior.

My opinion is the best belt has a lock AND security seal posts, affording greater flexibility in options to securing belt.

[Larrup]

With just seals, they must be destroyed each time belt is removed.

Yes, but they offer proof that the belt was removed. If the belt was removed without permission, and/or good reason, punishment would surely follow. (But that requires the Keyholder/Punisher to be local.)

With a lock, it is reusable. Problem with locks is wearer getting unauthorized access to key, or picking the lock and reinstalling lock before Keyholder discovers that.

Yes, and that is especially a problem with people like the Gorgon who pick locks for fun. So seals are necessary for you. There is no such thing as an unpickable lock.

If someone is going to be locked long term, or if the Keyholder is remote, then both systems (lock and security seal) offer more options. If wearer is caught being naughty and performing unathorized belt removals, then throwing a security seal on the belt is the fast answer to that behavior.

There are key safes with internet access, to allow the key holder to control access, but they are pricey. It would also be hard to make them totally secure; there is no such thing as total security when you have access to the hardware.

My opinion is the best belt has a lock AND security seal posts, affording greater flexibility in options to securing belt.

Yes! Both is better. Especially with the Gorgon.

I have to say, though, that I love it how you work to make your belts more secure.

[Pyra Gorgon]

@ Larrup:

Heh.

The only thing is price on security seals and keeping inventory of serial numbers. The ones I bought cost over $2.20 a piece once shipping was factored in. Of course, buying in bulk does reduce each unit price, but still...it can get costly if you are constantly removing them. This is why I said about long term wear, that would hold down the daily price of using them. (take unit price of one and divide by number of days in service will give you daily cost of using a security seal.)

Are they more economical than gettting a high security tubular lockset custom fitted on belt? (to prevent gorgons from picking the things) You would have to do cost/benefit analysis on that. If you unlock the high security lock more times in a given period than you would use security seals, then perhaps just the lock is better money spent.

If a girl is being belted 30-90 day stretches no outs, perhaps security seal is more economically friendly. That would be a rough stint in belt, though. That long without a let out for hygiene is opening door to other health problems, which would then FORCE a let out for medical reasons.

[Larrup]

The only thing is price on security seals and keeping inventory of serial numbers. The ones I bought cost over $2.20 a piece once shipping was factored in.

I can afford that.

If a girl is being belted 30-90 day stretches no outs ...

I couldn't wait 90 days. So she wouldn't have to either.

[Pyra Gorgon]

I couldn't wait 90 days. So she wouldn't have to either.

In the case of being belted, impatient men with high libodo are very nice to have around.

[Pyra Gorgon]

THIS is what a security seal looks like installed...