BeltedGirls.com

dashingdarla wrote:

virginitysaving wrote:Have you (not your husband) ever worn a chastity device?

Not since the 70's, but yes.

virginitysaving wrote:Fine, but this discussion is dedicated to female chastity.

Fair enough, though this section of the website is called "Female chastity belt building/modification", and that's why I joined. I've made a lot of belts over the years out of different materials (leather, canvas, mild steel, aluminum, even carbon fiber) and I've never gotten the patterns right and ended up with chafe and pinch spots. This is why I'm so interested in Pyra's patterning article.

The only reason why I shared what I did was to make a point to Lizza that her initial outburst and ones like it in the future could be hurtful to others due to her expressed lack of tolerance. Obviously, that point was lost when I received her "shut up and be quiet" response and that's fine, it is what it is.

Intolerance is a hot button for me, as I've spent easily 40 years furthering tolerance through education, public speaking, activism, organizations and demonstrations. I long for the day where we can tolerate each other's differences, for I believe with great passion, none of us are truly free until we do.

Anyway, I am here to improve my ability in making female chastity belts. Whether my creations end up on a men, women or pumpkins, I think is kind of secondary.

Well said, Darla!

I do apologize for not investing more into the pattern making thread. I am doing some in depth analysis of ratios and such and also I am bogged down with other business related researching to do AND some online classes. Never fear, it will be completed!

Me too on the intolerance thing, Darla. Intolerance breeds all sorts of perverse future unintended consequences, so I feel it is best to nip in bud before that evil monster blossoms. However, not accepting things is very different from tolerating, sometimes people mix the two up and they are not equivocable.

I am curious about your aluminum and carbon fiber work. Would you share with me how you did that, Darla? It seems that aluminum would leach off on the body and cause a heightened aluminum toxicity. I dunno. Just from what I've read having aluminum against the body is not a good idea, like galvanized metal is not good either.

Maybe you could create an OP on exotic materials you have had success with for making chastity belts?

dashingdarla wrote:
I just don't because for me, it's a symbol of ownership.

Just curious he did the belts look like in 70s? Everything, you can find information about, was made not earlier than 90s.

dashingdarla wrote: Most people wear chastity belts for other reasons.

What I really don't understand why people hide they wear belts. Nothing wrong with it, really.

It is not like you would need to be hypnotized over and over to get it to working. It may take some time initially to "set it up", but then it should basically work on its own. I assume you are worried of it "failing" once you are distracted or have your mind on different things? Usually that shouldn't happen, as long as you are comfy about the idea of being denied.

Very stressfull or "out of the order" situations may be able to break it or make it fade away in some cases. For some people hypnotic effects tend to get cancled out, but not for everyone. We all are individuals, and so it is hard to predict how things will go for you. But i would give it a 99% failsafe ratio when it comes to "orgasm denial" - when working with people who are into this kind of kink. But i would assume that people who look into chastity belts, may quite be


I think this way of orgasm denial may be even more "teasing" than no touch. You can argue about that, as some find no touch a pretty strong turnon as well, when you want to, but cannot. Yet with this way of denial, you are able to masturbate, are able to reach the edge, the very brink of orgasming - and then you ride it. No way to go over it. Some may argue that this is what makes chastity belts sexy, no touch at all. But if it is purely for the "orgasm denial" kink, then that one with hypnosis may be quite an experience all in itself.

Oh and sorry for the late reply, i only sometimes check this forum here

MindDevourer wrote:It is not like you would need to be hypnotized over and over to get it to working. It may take some time initially to "set it up", but then it should basically work on its own. I assume you are worried of it "failing" once you are distracted or have your mind on different things? Usually that shouldn't happen, as long as you are comfy about the idea of being denied.

Very stressfull or "out of the order" situations may be able to break it or make it fade away in some cases. For some people hypnotic effects tend to get cancled out, but not for everyone. We all are individuals, and so it is hard to predict how things will go for you. But i would give it a 99% failsafe ratio when it comes to "orgasm denial" - when working with people who are into this kind of kink. But i would assume that people who look into chastity belts, may quite be


I think this way of orgasm denial may be even more "teasing" than no touch. You can argue about that, as some find no touch a pretty strong turnon as well, when you want to, but cannot. Yet with this way of denial, you are able to masturbate, are able to reach the edge, the very brink of orgasming - and then you ride it. No way to go over it. Some may argue that this is what makes chastity belts sexy, no touch at all. But if it is purely for the "orgasm denial" kink, then that one with hypnosis may be quite an experience all in itself.

Oh and sorry for the late reply, i only sometimes check this forum here

For those interested about orgasm denial & chastity, I found this link:
http://agonizingabstinence.blogspot.fr/

here is tollyboy chastity belt was wear last my wife, girlfrend... It's picture I got my production I'm photographer... This is best quality for production... About order for tollyboy it's realy Richard Davis for busy for answer us letter becouse a lot off spam come from him... better for call or send post printed letter for him adresses... But dot forget it have neosteel, lockedinsteel usa, Latowski, carrara-designs.be, we can to seach not for google make at yandex... google at change and deleted most good site or information...
I got have a china chastity belt female... I know it's very chip, for at littel play, but not seriously wear your girl frend this devices...

next pic it's tollyboy production...

Nice to see some pictures of a Tollyboy. Looks to sit very tight on her.
Unfortunately, I don´t think it will be more Tollyboy belts made ​​of Richard.
He has promised to start several times, but nothing happens.

Tobbe wrote:Nice to see some pictures of a Tollyboy. Looks to sit very tight on her.
Unfortunately, I don´t think it will be more Tollyboy belts made ​​of Richard.
He has promised to start several times, but nothing happens.

That's right, we don't need no steenkin' Tollyboys anymore...

We got Tobbeboy's now!!!

pst...shameless plug for advertising for ya, Tobbe.

OK
In defence of Tollyboy you can see pictures of his belts. female or male..............
Show us pictures of the Tobbeboys belts please??

fitherin wrote:OK
In defence of Tollyboy you can see pictures of his belts. female or male..............
Show us pictures of the Tobbeboys belts please??

Well... wait Tobbe finish it.

No photos, it´s only a prototype.
We'll see if it also works practically with some new ideas how a chastity belt can be manufactured.

Just now being shaped to fit a particular lady's measurements.