NO chastity belt "is secure".All can be cut off etc, locks picked,it is all NONSENSE.
WHY am I bothering?
Good question
Lizza
Totally Rediculous
-
virginitysaving
- Posts: 182
- Joined: 20 Nov 2010, 21:22
- Sex: Female
Re: Totally Rediculous
But not right away.Lizza wrote:All can be cut off etc, locks picked
Re: Totally Rediculous
If it shows that the chastity belt opened illegally, it still has a function.
Every woman should wear chastity belt!
90% of women have never heard of it,
90% of all women who hear about it will find the idea good,
90% of all women who have tried it are enthusiastic.
There remains a lot of work
90% of women have never heard of it,
90% of all women who hear about it will find the idea good,
90% of all women who have tried it are enthusiastic.
There remains a lot of work
Re: Totally Rediculous
Buy her some steel gauntlets and hang them along side the drill/ angle grinder and hack saw, gently advise her that if she tries to remove the belt with out me and my key that the result would be a minimum of one week wearing gauntlets that lock on around her wrists as a deterent when ever I have to leave her alone, or while I am out of the house!
I am sure it will be a suitable deterent
I am sure it will be a suitable deterent
Re: Totally Rediculous
I am offended by your silly remark.HAH! Putting ME in "steel gauntlets" IU would like to see you try.How PERVERSE can YOU be? Typical male thinking.You sound so nasty to me.I am not "into bdsm" perversion.I live a pretty normal life."So there".You obviously have no respect for women.
Lizza
Lizza
Re: Totally Rediculous
I think if you check my tongue in cheek message you will see I never gave HER a name, of note I did put the gauntlets beside the tools needed to destroy them or disable them before she was obliged to wear them.As for BDSM i believe in safe sane CONSENSUAL in all matters relating to sex, so even if I had a woman I wanted to lock up I would discuss it with her and get herapproval.Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions. Its nice to have open discussions on subjects such as chastity.Lizza wrote:I am offended by your silly remark.HAH! Putting ME in "steel gauntlets" IU would like to see you try.How PERVERSE can YOU be? Typical male thinking.You sound so nasty to me.I am not "into bdsm" perversion.I live a pretty normal life."So there".You obviously have no respect for women.
Lizza
Last edited by fitherin on 23 Jun 2013, 11:00, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Totally Rediculous
"victim"? is that how you see a woman?how she could become one of your "victims"?
This is terrible.Almost scary.You should RESPECT the woman in your life, as you say, "if you have one".
Lizza
This is terrible.Almost scary.You should RESPECT the woman in your life, as you say, "if you have one".
Lizza
Re: Totally Rediculous
I apologise, you are correct a woman should never be a victim, I have amended the post.
-
virginitysaving
- Posts: 182
- Joined: 20 Nov 2010, 21:22
- Sex: Female
Re: Totally Rediculous
That's why I usually don't talk to men about subj. All conversations end up similarly.Lizza wrote:"victim"? is that how you see a woman?how she could become one of your "victims"?
This is terrible.Almost scary.You should RESPECT the woman in your life, as you say, "if you have one".
-
Robert Pinkerton
- Posts: 136
- Joined: 22 Nov 2011, 14:54
- Sex: Male
Re: Totally Rediculous
This will bring community lapidation upon me, but I respectfully submit that many BDSM ploys would actually be literally abusive outside the supposedly rigorous structure of rules and safety signals. (Lapidation is the malignant kind of stoning, in which members of the community throw rocks at the victim in order to kill him or her by repeated percussive injury. The rite is also an affirmation of community solidarity around the rule the victim is supposed to have broken. [In English, "being stoned" is a colloquial expression for cannabis intoxication; this is the supremely benevolent form of stoning, and it has nothing to do with throwing rocks.)
More than a decade ago, when first I published Effects of the Chastity Belt and their Implications by giving it to Brian, webmaster of the late and seriously missed lockmeup.com, much of what adverse reaction it elicited, centered around, "He doesn't know about BDSM!" To that, once I became web-active, I replied that simply I do not care about BDSM: The overwhelming majority thereof, with which I am conversant, I think worthy only of benevolent indifference; some of it makes my slap my forehead and roll my eyes upward in gobsmacked astonishment and some of it induces l.o.l. But at root, it is playing at make-believe. I am not party to the BDSM/fetish-interest subculture.
I acknowledge that I am patriarchal in social orientation, and that I possess a patrist world outlook. ("Acknowledge," rather than "confess" or "admit," because these latter terms signify owning up to wrongdoing, and I believe it is simply right to be patriarchal. Feminists do not like it? That is their problem.) Too, I believe that, in order properly to respect life, one must take it finally seriously, and I acknownedge that this induces disposition to take seriously: Learning not to take BDSM seriously was a venture into the counterintuitive. Still, much of it is "castles in the air."
Of course it is possible to escape from a lock-and Key chastity device if one is so disposed. What is much less possible is doing so surreptitiously. In real life, such an escape might carry such consequences as divorce or disinheritance.
More than a decade ago, when first I published Effects of the Chastity Belt and their Implications by giving it to Brian, webmaster of the late and seriously missed lockmeup.com, much of what adverse reaction it elicited, centered around, "He doesn't know about BDSM!" To that, once I became web-active, I replied that simply I do not care about BDSM: The overwhelming majority thereof, with which I am conversant, I think worthy only of benevolent indifference; some of it makes my slap my forehead and roll my eyes upward in gobsmacked astonishment and some of it induces l.o.l. But at root, it is playing at make-believe. I am not party to the BDSM/fetish-interest subculture.
I acknowledge that I am patriarchal in social orientation, and that I possess a patrist world outlook. ("Acknowledge," rather than "confess" or "admit," because these latter terms signify owning up to wrongdoing, and I believe it is simply right to be patriarchal. Feminists do not like it? That is their problem.) Too, I believe that, in order properly to respect life, one must take it finally seriously, and I acknownedge that this induces disposition to take seriously: Learning not to take BDSM seriously was a venture into the counterintuitive. Still, much of it is "castles in the air."
Of course it is possible to escape from a lock-and Key chastity device if one is so disposed. What is much less possible is doing so surreptitiously. In real life, such an escape might carry such consequences as divorce or disinheritance.